Puttnam Scholars 2023 Course Feedback
What were your expectations for this programme?
Overall organisation and structure of the seminars:
Highly organized and structured
Organized and structured
Neither organized nor disorganized
Disorganized and poorly structured
Highly disorganized and poorly structured
Relevance and applicability of the topics covered:
Extremely relevant and applicable
Relevant and applicable
Moderately relevant and applicable
Barely relevant and applicable
Not relevant or applicable at all
Quality of the presentation materials (slides, handbook, etc.):
Very poor quality
Opportunities for participant engagement and interaction:
Technical quality and reliability of the online platform:
Outstanding technical quality and reliability
Good technical quality and reliability
Average technical quality and reliability
Poor technical quality and reliability
Very Poor technical quality and reliability
The pacing of the seminars (too fast, too slow, or just right):
Extremely slow pacing
Relevance of the programme to the specific stage you are at in your career:
How likely are you to recommend the programme to another filmmaker / writer?
Are you happy to be contacted in future to participate in a filmed interview about your time on the programme? (The interview would be used for marketing purposes)
Critical Assessment / Reflection:
[Please explain your answers]
With which seminar did you find you engaged the most?
With which seminar did you find yourself least engaged?
Is there anything we could do that could have improved the seminars?
Were there any topics or specific areas that weren’t covered that you would like to have seen covered in the limited time available?
Do you feel the programme of seminars helped you in your professional development?
Has the programme helped you in mapping out your future career pathway?
Did the programme meet your expectations?